# Convenient-Invention Fact-Check: Chapter 03

DIFF SCOPE: `output/drafts/claude/chapter_03.round_01.md` vs `output/chapters/chapter_03.md` - 8 changed regions, 7 new/changed factual assertions extracted.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #1
post-edit text: line 15 "Theo was at the second easel from the door"
pre-edit text at that point: "third easel from the door"
class: detail
canon check: chapter card requires class pairs and Clarity Pass found adjacent seating necessary; no canon fixes exact easel number.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE - repair supports Chapter 03 spatial logic.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #2
post-edit text: line 43 Sam uses they/them and spatial room-making.
pre-edit text at that point: raw draft gendered Sam.
class: detail
canon check: `style_and_voice.md` defines Sam Rivera with they/them.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #3
post-edit text: line 59 "for June"
pre-edit text at that point: "for her"
class: knowledge/orientation
canon check: POV is June by chapter card.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #4
post-edit text: line 101 fresh charcoal appears without pencil-cup callback.
pre-edit text at that point: pencil-cup callback.
class: detail
canon check: no prior pencil-cup plant; deletion removes unlicensed callback.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #5
post-edit text: line 123 "Beside her"
pre-edit text at that point: "Two easels down"
class: detail
canon check: adjacent seating follows lines 15, 23, 43 and couples-class structure.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #6
post-edit text: line 157 practical route offer.
pre-edit text at that point: thematic "done being looked at" offer.
class: motivation/dialogue
canon check: Theo's voice card prioritizes practical offer under pressure.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

INVENTION CANDIDATE #7
post-edit text: line 161 only scarf obligation remains.
pre-edit text at that point: payment-plan joke.
class: connection
canon check: S-SCARF-01 requires scarf return obligation; payment-plan joke not needed.
verdict: CANON-COMPATIBLE.

Verdict: NO-INVENTIONS.

Revision orders: none.
